¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©e­û·|¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ  ¬ã¨s·J³ø²Ä36¸¹
¡@

¤ô½_·s«~ºØ¥x±ð17¸¹¤§¨|¦¨

ªL°ê²M¡@«JºÖ¤À¡@³¯¶©¿A

ºK¡@¡@­n

¡@¡@ªL°ê²M¡B«JºÖ¤À¡B³¯¶©¿A¡E1999¡E¤ô½_·s«~ºØ¥x±ð17¸¹¤§¨|¦¨¡C¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¬ã¨s·J³ø36¡G1¡ã19¡C

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹­ì«~¨t¦WºÙ¬°¥x±ð¨|18030¸¹¡A«Y¹A·~¸ÕÅç©Ò¹Å¸q¤À©Ò©ó¥Á°ê78¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¡A¥H¥x¹A70¸¹/Milyang 79//¥x¹A70¸¹¤§§Ü½_¼ö¯f²Ä¤G¥@¥N³æ®è¬°¥À¥»¡A¥x¹A70¸¹¬°¤÷¥»¶i¦æÂø¥æ¡A©ó¥Á°ê81¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@²Ä5¥@¥N²¾¥æ¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¶i¦æ«á¥b¬q¨|ºØ¤u§@¡C¸gÆ[¹î¸ÕÅç¡Bªì¡B°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç¡A¤Î°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç»P¦U¶µ¯S©Ê¡B¯fÂή`ÀË©wµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡G¥»«~ºØ¬°¤@¤¤±ß¼ô«~ºØ¡F®è°ª¤¤µ¥¡F®è«¬Àu¨}¡F¥~Æ[¦Ì½è¤Î­¹¨ý¬ÒÀu¨}¡F½_¼ö¯f¤¤§Ü¦Ü§Ü¡B²æ²É©Ê¾A¤¤¤Î¨ã¬Û·í²£¶qµ¥Àu¨}¯S©Ê¡C¸g½_§@¨|ºØ¤p²Õ±À¯ò¥Ó½Ðµn°O©R¦W¡A¦Ó©ó¥Á°ê87¦~11¤ë¸g¹AªLÆU¥l¶°¤§§@ª«·s«~ºØµn°O©R¦W¼f¬d¤p²Õ³q¹L¡A©R¦W¬°¥x±ð17¸¹Ác´Þ±À¼s¡C¥Ñ©ó¥»«~ºØ¨ã¦³¤W­z¤§Àu¨}¯S©Ê¡A¹w´Á¥»«~ºØ±N¥i¬°¹A¥Á±µ¨ü¡A¨Ãº¡¨¬°ê¤H¹ï°ª«~½è½_¦Ì¤§»Ý¨D¡A¶i¦Ó½w©M§Ú°ê¥[¤J¥@¶T²Õ´«á¶i¤f¦Ì¤§½ÄÀ»¤Î¼W¥[¹A¥Á¦¬¯q¡C

Ãö Áä µü¡G¤ô½_¡B¥x±ð17¸¹

±µ¨ü¤é´Á¡G1999¦~10¤ë27¤é


«e¡@¡@¨¥

¡@¡@½_¦Ì¬°°ê¤H¤§¥D­n³­¹¡Aªñ¦~¨Ó¥Ñ©ó°ê®a¸gÀÙ¤§Ácºa¡AªÀ·|¥Í¬¡µ²ºcµo¥Í§ïÅÜ¡A¤H¥Á¥Í¬¡¤ô·ÇÅãµÛ´£°ª¡A¦Ì­¹¦]ÄÑ­¹¤Î°ªÀç¾i­¹«~³½¡B¦×µ¥®ø¶O¤§¼W¥[¦Ó¤éÁÍ´î¤Ö¡A¬F©²Áö±À¦æ½_¦Ì´î²£¬Fµ¦¡A°ß¤´¦~¦~¥Í²£¹L³Ñ¡C¥t¥Ñ©ó°ê¤H¥Í¬¡«~½è¤§´£°ª¤Î§Ú°ê§Y±N¥[¤J¥@¬É¶T©ö²Õ´¡A°ª«~½è¦Ìµo®i¯q§Î­«­n¡C¥»³õ¦³Å²©ó¦¹¡Aªñ¦~¤ô½_¤§¨|ºØ¥Ø¼Ð¦b§YµÛ­«¥~Æ[¦Ì½è¤Î­¹¨ý¬ÒÀu¨}°ª«~½è«~ºØ¤§¨|¦¨¡A¨Ã¥ø¨ãÂײ£©Ê¤Î§Ü¯fÂΩʡA¥H²Å°ê¤H°ª«~½è½_¦Ì®ø¶O¤§»Ý¨D¡A¨Ã¼W¥[¹A¥Á¤§¦¬¯q¤Î½w©M¶i¤f¦Ì¤§½ÄÀ»¡C

§÷®Æ¤Î¤èªk

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹­ì«~¨t¦WºÙ¬°¥x±ð¨|18030¸¹¡A«Y¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò©ó¥Á°ê78¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¥H¥x¹A70¸¹/Milyang 79//¥x¹A70¸¹¤§§Ü½_¼ö¯f²Ä¤G¥@¥N³æ®è»P¥x¹A70¸¹Âø¥æ¡A80¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@²Ä¥|¥@¥N¿ï¥X«á½s¸¹¬°¥x±ð¨|18030¸¹¡A¸g§NÂä@´Á«á°e¥æ¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õÄ~Äò¿ï¨|¡C81¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¦Ü84¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¸gÆ[¹î¸ÕÅç¡Bªì¡B°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç«á¡A©ó85¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@°_°Ñ¥[¤G¦~¥|´Á§@¤§¥þ¬Ùúz½_°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¡C°ª¯Å¸ÕÅç°_¨Ã°Ñ¥[¥þ¬Ù²Î¤@¯f®E¯S©ÊÀË©w¡C87¦~11¤ë4¤é¸g¹AªLÆU¥l¶°¤§§@ª«·s«~ºØµn°O©R¦W¼f¬d¤p²Õ³q¹L¡A©R¦W¬°¥xúz17¸¹¡A¥Ñ¥x«n³õ¶i¦æ­ì­ìºØ¤§Ác´Þ¤Î±À¼s¡A¨|¦¨¸g¹L²­z¦p¤U¡G

¤@¡BÂø¥æ¤Î¨ä«á¥N¤ÀÂ÷¿ï©Þ¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤§Âø¥æ¤Î«á¥N¤ÀÂ÷¿ï©Þµ¥¿ï¨|¤u§@«Y¥Ñ¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò¶i¦æ¡C¹Å¸q¤À©Ò¬°§ïµ½¨ã°ª²£¡B¦Ì½èÀu¨}¡B§Ü½Å­¸½¾¥x¹A70¸¹¤§§Ü½_¼ö¯f»P®è°ª¯S©Ê¡A77¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¥H¥x¹A70¸¹¬°¥À¥»¡A»P±q°ê»Ú½_¼ö¯f®E¿ï¥X¨ã§Ü½_¼ö¯f±j¡A®è´Óµy¸G¡B¦Ì½è¨Î¤§Áú°ê«~ºØMilyang79¬°¤÷¥»¶i¦æÂø¥æ¡A77¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@´_¥H¨äÂø¥æ²Ä¤@¥@¥N¬°¥À¥»¡A»P¥x¹A70¸¹¶i¦æ¦^¥æ¤u§@¡C78¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¥Ñ¦^¥æ¤§²Ä¤G¥@¥N¿ï¥X®è«¬Àu¨}¡A§Ü½_¼ö¯f¤§³æ®è¬°¥À¥»¡A¦A»P¥x¹A70¸¹Âø¥æ¡A¸g¥Ñ¨tÃШ|ºØªk¡A©ó80¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@²Ä¥|¥@¥N¿ï¥X«á½s¸¹¬°¥x±ð¨|18030¸¹¡A¸g§NÂä@´Á«á²¾¥æ¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¶i¦æÆ[¹î¤Î²£¶q¸ÕÅç¡]ªí1¡^¡C

ªí1.¡@¤ô½_¥x±ð17¸¹¨|¦¨¸g¹L
Table 1. Breeding procedure of japonica rice variety ¡§Taikeng 17¡¨

ªí1.¤ô½_¥x±ð17¸¹¨|¦¨¸g¹L¹Ïªí<br>Table 1. Breeding procedure of japonica rice variety ¡§Taikeng 17¡¨

¤G¡BÆ[¹î¡B²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç¡G

(¤@)Æ[¹î¸ÕÅç

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹©ó¥Á°ê81¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@°Ñ¥[±ð½_·s«~¨tÆ[¹î¸ÕÅç¡A¥»¸ÕÅç±Ä¶¶§Ç±Æ¦C¡BµL­«½Æ¡B³æ¥»´Ó¡B¤G¦æ°Ï¡B¨C¦æºØ´Ó30®è¡C¸ÕÅçµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¥»«~ºØ¥~Æ[¤wÁÍ©T©w¡A®è°ª¤¤µ¥¡A®è«¬¨}¦n¥B¨ãÂײ£©Ê¡A¸g½Õ¬d¨ä½_½\¤½³¼²£¶q¬°5956¤½¤ç¡A»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹¬Û¦P¡A«~½è¨}¦n¡]ªí2¡^¡C

ªí2.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¦bÆ[¹î¸ÕÅ礧¦¨ÁZ¡]¥Á°ê81¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¡^
Table 2. Performance of Taikeng 17 in observational trial (2nd crop, 1992).
«~ ºØ
Variety
¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
®è °ª
Plant height
(cm)
­Ë¥ñ©Ê
Lodging
½_½\²£¶qYield ÁW¦Ì«~½è
Quality of
brown rice
Kg/ha %
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
118 96 ª½erect 5956 100.0 3 good
Tainung 67 (ck)
¥x¹A67¸¹¡]¹ï·Ó¡^
120 96 ª½erect 5956 100.0 4 medium

(¤G)ªì¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹°Ñ¥[82¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¤§ªì¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç¡A¥»¸ÕÅç±Ä¶¶§Ç±Æ¦C¡A¤G­«½Æ¡A¤p°Ï­±¿n4.5¢T¡C¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A¥x±ð17¸¹¨C¤½³¼½_½\²£¶q¬°8556¤½¤ç¡A¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹¼W²£11.6¢H¡A¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ¦­¼ô¤G¤Ñ¡A¦Ì½èÀu¨}¡]ªí3¡^¡C¥B¸g¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©ÒÀË©wµ²ªG½_¼ö¯f¬°§Ü¯Å¡A¸g¿ï¥X®Ê¤J°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç¡C

ªí3.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¦bªì¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅ礧¦¨ÁZ¡]¥Á°ê82¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¡^
Table 3. Perfermance of Taikeng 17 in preliminary yield trail (1st crop, 1993).
«~ ºØ
Variety
¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
®è°ª
Plant height
(cm)
ÁJ¼Æ
Panicle
number
­Ë¥ñ©Ê
Lodging
½_½\²£¶q
Yield
(Kg/ha)
«ü ¼Æ
Index
(%)
ÁW¦Ì«~½è
Quality of
brown rice
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
127 105.7 20.0 1 slope 8556 111.6 2 excellent
¥x¹A67¸¹(¹ï·Ó)
Tainung 67 (ck)
129 105.6 18.3 1 slope 7667 100.0 4 medium

(¤T)°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹°Ñ¥[¦Û¥Á°ê82¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¦Ü84¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¨â¦~¥|´Á§@¤§°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅç¡A¸ÕÅç±Ä³{¾÷§¹¥þ°Ï¶°³]­p¡A¥|­«½Æ¡A¤p°Ï­±¿n4.5¢T¡C¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A¨C¤½³¼½_½\²£¶q²Ä¤@´Á§@¥­§¡¬°6804¤½¤ç¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°5740¤½¤ç¡A¦U¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹´î²£0.5¢H¤Î6.5¢H¡C²Ä¤G´Á§@¸û¬°§C²£¤§­ì¦]¥D­n¬°¸Z¹ê²v¸û§C¤§¬G¡C¥x±ð17¸¹¤§¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ²Ä¤@´Á§@¸û¥x¹A67¸¹¦­¤@¤Ñ¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬Û¦P¡F®è°ª²Ä¤@´Á§@¥x±ð17¸¹¸û¸G¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¸û°ª¡A¦ý¬Ò¬°¤¤µ¥¡F­Ë¥ñ©Ê¨â«~ºØ¬Ò¬Û¦P¡A¤@´Á§@¬°±×¡A¤G´Á§@¬°ª½¡F¥~Æ[¦Ì½è¥x±ð17¸¹ªí²{Àu¨}¡]ªí4¡^¡C¥»³õ¤§¦Ì¶º¸Õ­¹¡A±oª¾¨ä­¹¨ýÀu¨}¡F¥þ¬Ù²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©wÅã¥Ü½_¼ö¯f¬°¤¤§Ü¦Ü§Ü¯Å¡C¸g½_§@¨|ºØ¤p²Õ¼f¬d³q¹L¡A­ã¤©°Ñ¥[85¦~²Õ¤§¥þ¬Ùúz½_°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¡C

ªí4.¡@¦b°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅ礤¥x±ð17¸¹»P¥x¹A67¸¹²£¶q¡B¦Ì½è¤Î¹AÃÀ©Êª¬¤§¤ñ¸û1
Table 4. Comparison of grain yield, quality and other agronomic characteristics in advanced yield trial between Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67.
¶µ¥Ø
Item
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
¥x¹A67¸¹¡]¹ï·Ó¡^
Tainung 67 (ck)
¤@´Á§@
1st crop
¤G´Á§@
2nd crop
¤@´Á§@
1st crop
¤G´Á§@
2nd crop
ÚØ¡@¡@¦â
Grain color
²H¶À
light yellow
²H¶À
light yellow
²H¶À
light yellow
²H¶À
light yellow
ÚØ ¦y ¦â
Apiculus color
½_¯ó
straw
½_¯ó
straw
½_¯ó
straw
½_¯ó
straw
¨~
Awn
µL
no
µL
no
µL
no
µL
no
¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth duration (day)
134 105 135 105
®è¡@¡@°ª
Plant height (cm)
106.8 107.0 109.7 103.8
ÁJ¡@¡@¼Æ
Panicle number
18.0 15.4 17.4 15.2
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet per panicle
91.7 100.3 89.2 93.6
¸Z ¹ê ²v
Fertility (%)
91.9 80.4 92.8 83.7
¤d ²É ­«
1000-kernel weight (g)
26.0 25.6 26.1 25.7
­Ë ¥ñ ©Ê
Lodging
1
slope
0
erect
1
slope
0.5
erect
½_½\²£¶q2
Yield (kg/ha)
6804 a 5740 b 6839 a 6137 a
«ü¡@¡@¼Æ¡]%¡^
Index
99.5 93.5 100.0 100.0
ÁW¦Ì«~½è
Quality of brown rice
2.5
excellent
2
excellent
4
medium
4
medium

1.¥Á°ê82¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¦Ü84¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¶i¦æ¸ÕÅç¡F¦U´Á§@¦¨ÁZ¬°¨â¦~¥­§¡¡C
2.«~ºØ¶¡¦P´Á§@½_½\²£¶q©Òªþ­^¤å¦r¥À¬Û¦PªÌ«Y¸g¾HªÖ¤ó¦hÅܰì´ú©w®t²§¤£ÅãµÛ¡]£\¡×0.05¡^¡C

¤T¡B±ð½_°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¦Û¥Á°ê85¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¦Ü86¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@°Ñ¥[¬°´Á¤G¦~¥|´Á§@¤§¥þ¬Ù±ð½_°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¡C¸ÕÅç¦aÂI¬°®ç¶éµ¥¤C³B¡A±Ä³{¾÷§¹¥þ°Ï¶°§éÅ|³]­p¡A­«½Æ¥|¦¸¡A¤p°Ï­±¿n4.5¢T¡C¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A¥x±ð17¸¹¤§¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¥­§¡¬°127¤Ñ¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°112¤Ñ¡A¤À§O¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹¦­1¤Ñ¤Î±ß1¤Ñ¡F®è°ª²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°104.2¤½¤À¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°102.4¤½¤À¡A»P¥x¹A67¸¹¬Û­Y¡FÁJ¼Æ¡B¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ¡B¤d²É­«¡A¨â«~ºØ©ó¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¥ç¬Û­Y¡F¸Z¹ê²v¥x±ð17¸¹¸û§C¡]ªí5¡^¡C½_½\¨C¤½³¼²£¶q¡A¤»³B¡]ªá½¬°Ï³¾®`¤£­p¡^¥­§¡µ²ªG¡A¥x±ð17¸¹²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°6269¤½¤ç¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@5451¤½¤ç¡A¤À§O¸û¥x¹A67¸¹§C²£7.7¢H¤Î2.3¢H¡Aªí²{¸û°ª¦a°Ï¬°¹ü¤Æ¸Õ°Ï¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¼W²£10.7¢H¡A°ß®t²§¦b²Î­p¤W¨Ã¤£ÅãµÛ¡]ªí6¡^¡C¥»«~ºØ¤§½_½\²£¶qí©w©Ê¤ÀªRµ²ªG¸û¥x¹A67¸¹¤£Ã­©w¡]¹Ï1¡^¡C

ªí5a.¥x±ð17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹°Ï°ì¸ÕÅ礤¤§¥D­n¹AÃÀ©Êª¬¡]¥Á°ê85¤Î86¦~¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^¡Ð ¤@´Á§@
Table 5a. Major agronomic characteristics of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 in regional yield trails (Average of 1996 and 1997) -1st crop season.
«~ ºØ
Variety
¦a¡@¡@ÂI
Location
®ç¶é
Taoyuan
¹ü¤Æ
Changhua
¹Å¸q
Chiayi
«ÌªF
Pintung
¥xªF
Taitung
ªá½¬
Hualian
©yÄõ
Ilan
¥­§¡
Mean
¥x±ð17¸¹Taikeng17 ¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
126 138 124 121 129 125 126 127
®è°ª
Plant height (cm)
103.3 104.2 112.7 100.6 102.4 107.6 98.8 104.2
ÁJªø
Panicle length (cm)
18.8 17.8 18.9 17.2 17.2 18.1 16.3 17.8
ÁJ­«
Panicle weight (g)
1.74 2.18 2.04 1.93 1.82 1.52 1.86 1.87
ÁJ¼Æ
Panicle number
16.8 20.5 17.5 14.8 18.3 16.4 13.6 16.9
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet
per panicle
91.1 99.5 96.2 98.1 81.6 87.1 87.6 91.6
¸Z¹ê²v
Fertility (%)
65.1 82.9 81.6 75.7 90.1 66.7 85.6 78.2
¤d²É­«
1000-kernel
weight (g)
24.0 24.3 23.1 23.7 24.5 23.2 23.1 23.7
¥x¹A67¸¹ Tainung67(ck) ¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
128 137 126 121 132 127 126 128
®è°ª
Plant height (cm)
106.7 106.3 109.2 100.1 105.8 103.2 100.1 104.5
ÁJªø
Panicle length (cm)
18.2 18.0 18.5 16.4 17.7 17.3 17.0 17.6
ÁJ­«
Panicle weight (g)
2.00 2.29 1.98 2.00 1.71 1.42 1.99 1.91
ÁJ¼Æ
Panicle number
16.7 20.3 17.5 15.9 18.9 16.1 13.6 17.0
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet
per panicle
93.2 105.1 87.5 97.7 79.2 82.8 89.2 90.7
¸Z¹ê²v
Fertility (%)
76.1 84.1 85.8 79.9 86.5 65.1 86.8 80.6
¤d²É­«
1000-kernel
weight (g)
24.6 24.0 23.9 23.8 23.7 24.3 23.4 23.9

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¦U°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ´£¨Ñ¡A¹A·~¸ÕÅç©Ò·J¾ã¡C

ªí5b.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹°Ï°ì¸ÕÅ礤¤§¥D­n¹AÃÀ©Êª¬¡]¥Á°ê85¤Î86¦~¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^¡Ð¤G´Á§@
Table 5b. Major agronomic characteristics of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 in regional yield trails (Average of 1996 and 1997) - 2nd crop season.
«~ ºØ
Variety
¦a¡@¡@ÂI
Location
®ç¶é
Taoyuan
¹ü¤Æ
Changhua
¹Å¸q
Chiayi
«ÌªF
Pintung
¥xªF
Taitung
ªá½¬
Hualian
©yÄõ
Ilan
¥­§¡
Mean
¥x±ð17¸¹ Taikeng17 ¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
111 102 118 107 111 121 118 112
®è°ª
Plant height (cm)
102.9 106.0 103.9 100.9 103.4 104.6 95.3 102.4
ÁJªø
Panicle length (cm)
18.3 19.3 20.9 18.7 18.2 17.9 17.5 18.7
ÁJ­«
Panicle weight (g)
2.01 3.28 2.36 1.96 2.40 1.58 1.80 2.20
ÁJ¼Æ
Panicle number
15.8 16.0 14.3 11.6 13.0 14.7 12.6 14.0
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet
per panicle
91.6 133.7 111.3 94.7 97.8 88.8 81.8 100.0
¸Z¹ê²v
Fertility (%)
76.8 89.2 82.8 73.9 85.3 62.7 69.6 77.2
¤d²É­«
1000-kernel
weight (g)
24.6 25.7 23.0 24.6 25.6 23.9 23.0 24.3
¥x¹A67¸¹ Tainung67 (ck) ¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
111 103 117 107 110 116 114 111
®è°ª
Plant height (cm)
103.2 104.4 102.7 99.8 113.8 101.6 96.8 103.2
ÁJªø
Panicle length (cm)
17.0 17.5 20.1 17.9 16.9 16.1 16.3 17.4
ÁJ­«
Panicle weight (g)
2.34 3.04 2.64 2.40 2.34 2.00 1.92 2.38
ÁJ¼Æ
Panicle number
14.7 14.7 12.9 10.8 12.8 14.6 12.6 13.3
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet
per panicle
102.4 120.8 115.0 105.6 94.4 96.4 83.5 102.6
¸Z¹ê²v
Fertility (%)
81.7 92.5 86.7 84.5 88.8 75.1 69.6 82.4
¤d²É­«
1000-kernel
weight (g)
25.0 25.7 23.6 24.8 24.8 24.5 23.1 24.5

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¦U°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ´£¨Ñ¡A¹A·~¸ÕÅç©Ò·J¾ã¡C

ªí6.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹»P¥x¹A67¸¹¦b°Ï°ì¸ÕÅ礧²£¶q¤ñ¸û¡]¥Á°ê85¡B86¦~¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^
Table 6. Comparison of grain yield between Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 in regional yield trials (Average of 1996 and 1997).
¦a ÂI Location ´Á §@ Crop season ¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
¥x¹A67¸¹
Tainung 67
²£ ¶q1
Yield
²£ ¶q1
Yield
Kg/ha % Kg/ha %
®ç ¶é
Taoyuan
¢¹ 4797 b 76.0 6313 a 100.0
¢º 5989 a 96.3 6217 a 100.0
¹ü ¤Æ
Changhua
¢¹ 8980 a 100.1 8968 a 100.0
¢º 7947 a 110.7 7181 a 100.0
¹Å ¸q
Chiayi
¢¹ 5231 b 79.5 6583 a 100.0
¢º 4550 b 85.5 5323 a 100.0
«Ì ªF
Pintung
¢¹ 6686 a 103.0 6492 a 100.0
¢º 4306 b 86.4 4981 a 100.0
¥x ªF
Taitung
¢¹ 6756 a 98.4 6867 a 100.0
¢º 6203 a 101.6 6103 a 100.0
ªá ½¬
Hualian
¢¹ 5182 a 106.0 4887 b 100.0
¢º 3732 b 89.4 4173 a 100.0
©y Äõ
Ilan
¢¹ 5167 b 93.6 5522 a 100.0
¢º 3714 a 101.1 3675 a 100.0
¥­ §¡2
Mean
¢¹ 6269 92.3 6791 100.0
¢º 5451 97.7 5580 100.0

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¦U°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ´£¨Ñ¡A¹A·~¸ÕÅç©Ò·J¾ã

1.«~ºØ¶¡¦P´Á§@½_½\²£¶q©Òªþ­^¤å¦r¥À¬Û¦PªÌ¡A«Y¸g¾HªÖ¤ó¦hÅܰì´ú©w¡]£\¡×0.05¡^®t²§¤£ÅãµÛ¡C
2.¥­§¡²£¶q¡G¤£­pªá½¬¡]³¾®`¡^¥~¤§¤»³B¥­§¡¡C

¥|¡B´áªÎ®ÄÀ³´úÅç¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹©ó¥Á°ê85¦~²Ä¤@´Á§@¦Ü86¦~²Ä¤G´Á§@¤G¦~¥|´Á§@Á|¦æ´áªÎ®ÄÀ³´ú©w¡A¥H¨Ñ±À¼s«á®â°ö¤§°Ñ¦Ò¡C´á¯À¥Î¶q¤À¬°80¡B120¡B160¡B200 kg/haµ¥¥|¯Å¶Z¡AÁCÓþ»P®ñ¤Æ¹[¤À§O¬°72 kg/ha¤Î84 kg/ha¡C¸ÕÅç±Äµõ°Ï³]­p¡A¤T­«½Æ¡AªÎ®Æ¬°¥D¸Õ°Ï¡A«~ºØ¬°°Æ°Ï¡Cºî¦X¨â¦~¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¤§®è°ªÀH´á¯À¬I¥Î¶q¤§¼W¦h¦Ó¼W°ª¡A§Ü­Ë¥ñ¤@ª½¦Ü160 kg/ha®É©|ºû«ù¨}¦n¡A200 kg/ha®É«h·|¦³¶É±×²{¹³µo¥Í¡F½_½\²£¶qÀH´á¯À¬I¥Î¶q¤§¼W¦h¦ÓÅãµÛ¼W²£¡F´á¯À¼W¬I®Ä¯q¡A¥H120 kg/ha³B²z¸û¨Î¡A¨C¼W¬I1¤¸´á¯À¡A¥i¼W¦¬¯q10.56¤¸¡A¸û¦¹¼W¬I«á¨ä¦¬¯q§e»¼´î²{¶H¡C¦]¦¹²Ä¤@´Á§@¾A·í¤§´á¯À¬I¥Î¶q¬°120¡ã160 kg/ha¡C²Ä¤G´Á§@®è°ª»P½_½\²£¶q¬ÒÀH´á¯À¤§¼W¬I¦Óª@°ª¡A¬ÒµL­Ë¥ñ²{¶H¡A´á¯À¼W¬I®Ä¯q¥ç¥H120 kg/ha¸û¨Î¡A¼W¬I«á»¼´î¡C¥Ñ¥»¸ÕÅçÅã¥Ü¡A¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¥x±ð17¸¹´á¯À¾A·í¬I¥Î¶q¬Ò¬°120¡ã160 kg/ha¡]ªí7¡^¡C

ªí7a.¡@¥xúz17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹´áªÎ®ÄÀ³¤ñ¸û¡]¥Á°ê85¡B86¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^¡Ð ¤@´Á§@
Table 7a. The response of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 to N-fertilizer (Average of 1996 And 1997) -1st crop season.
´áªÎ¶q1 Nitrogen level «~ºØVariety
¥x±ð17¸¹ Taikeng 17 ¥x¹A67¸¹ Tainung 67
N1 N2 N3 N4 N1 N2 N3 N4
¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth duration (day)
131 131 132 133 131 131 132 133
®è °ª Plant height (cm) 91.7 96.3 103.8 104.8 91.3 96.1 99.9 109.2
ÁJ ¼Æ Panicle number 13.6 15.4 17.0 18.4 14.6 15.7 16.6 18.7
ÁJ ªø Panicle length (cm) 18.8 18.7 19.2 20.1 17.4 17.9 17.6 18.7
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet per panicle
95.7 95.8 103.4 103.3 89.4 94.9 92.1 102.4
ÁJ ­« Panicle weight (g) 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.2
¸Z ¹ê ²v Fertility (%) 91.0 89.7 86.1 85.7 90.8 89.8 90.0 81.4
½\¤d²É­«
1000-kernel weight (g)
25.2 24.5 23.4 23.6 25.7 25.9 25.4 23.6
­Ë¥ñ©Ê Lodging ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
±×
slope
½\²£¶q2 Yield (kg/ha) 7221 d 7735 c 8043 b 8277 a 6808 d 7180 c 7871 a 7560 b
«ü ¼Æ Index 100.0 107.1 111.4 114.6 100.0 105.5 115.6 111.1
¤@¤½¤É­«¶q
Volume weight (g/l)
½\ Grain 571 566 557 562 571 563 563 559
ÁW ¦Ì Brown rice 809 808 804 805 816 816 816 812
ÁW¦Ì²v ¢H of brown rice 80.4 81.0 80.5 81.0 81.7 82.3 82.0 82.7
ÁW¦Ì«~½è
Quality of brown rice
2
excellent
2
excellent
2.3
excellent
2
excellent
4
medium
4
medium
4
medium
4
medium
´áªÎ¼W¬I®Ä¯q3
Profit of N fertilizer
(dollar/dollar)
¡Ð 10.56 8.45 7.23 ¡Ð 7.64 10.92 5.15
  1. ªÎ®Æ³B²zµ¥¯Å´á¯À¤À§O¬°N1¡G80 kg/ha¡BN2¡G120 kg/ha¡BN3¡G160 kg/ha¤ÎN4¡G200 kg/haµ¥¥|¯Å¡A ÁCÓþ72 kg/ha¡A®ñ¤Æ¹[84 kg/ha¡C
  2. ¦P¤@«~ºØ½_½\²£¶q©Òªþ­^¤å¦r¥À¬Û¦PªÌ¡A«Y¸g¾HªÖ¤ó¦hÅܰì´ú©w¡]£\¡×0.05¡^®t²§¤£ÅãµÛ¡C
  3. ´áªÎ¼W¬I®Ä¯q¡F¡e³B²z°Ï¡Ð¹ï·Ó°Ï²£¶q¡]³Ì§CªÎ80 kg¡ÐN/ha¡^]¡Ñ¤½Â³»²¾É¦¬ÁÊ»ù®æ¡]18¤¸/kg¡^÷¼W¬IªÎ®Æ¦¨¥»¡C²¸»Ï¨C¤½¤ç4.6¤¸¡]184¤¸÷40kg¡^¡A§éºâ¨C¤½¤ç´á¯À¬°21.9¤¸¡e¡]4.6÷21¡^¡Ñ100¡f¡C
ªí7b.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹´áªÎ®ÄÀ³¤ñ¸û¡]¥Á°ê85¡B86¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^¡Ð ¤G´Á§@
Table 7b. The response of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 to N-fertilizer (Average of 1996 And 1997) -2nd crop season.
´áªÎ¶q1
Nitrogen level
«~ºØVariety
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
¥x¹A67¸¹
Tainung 67
N1 N2 N3 N4 N1 N2 N3 N4
¥þ¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ
Whole growth
duration (day)
113 112 114 115 111 111 112 113
®è °ª
Plant height (cm)
98.8 101.9 103.2 106.7 97.5 104.2 102.5 107.9
ÁJ ¼Æ
Panicle number
11.8 12.7 13.0 13.6 14.6 13.0 12.4 13.6
ÁJ ªø
Panicle length (cm)
19.4 19.6 19.9 20.2 18.5 18.4 19.0 19.4
¤@ÁJ¿oªá¼Æ
No. of spikelet
per panicle
112.8 117.4 114.7 117.5 109.8 110.2 115.2 123.3
ÁJ ­«
Panicle weight (g)
2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.6 3.0 2.8
¸Z ¹ê ²v
Fertility (%)
86.0 86.4 83.7 81.4 89.4 87.1 85.0 85.1
½\¤d²É­«
1000-kernel weight (g)
24.4 24.5 24.5 23.9 24.3 24.6 23.7 23.8
­Ë¥ñ©Ê
Lodging
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
ª½
erect
½\²£¶q2
Yield (kg/ha)
5886 d 6295 c 6421 b 6726 a 5910 c 6377 ab 6096 b 6474 a
«ü ¼Æ
Index
100.0 107.0 109.1 114.3 100.0 107.9 103.2 109.5
¤@¤½¤É­«¶q
Volume weight (g/l)
½\
Grain
569 559 559 555 560 553 550 545
ÁW ¦Ì
Brown rice
823 819 814 815 820 821 815 815
ÁW¦Ì²v
¢H of brown rice
81.1 80.0 81.0 80.7 82.0 81.3 81.6 81.4
ÁW¦Ì«~½è
Quality of brown rice
2
excellent
2
excellent
2
excellent
2
excellent
4
medium
4
medium
4
medium
4
medium
´áªÎ¼W¬I®Ä¯q3
Profit of N fertilizer
(dollar/dollar)
¡Ð 8.40 5.50 5.75 ¡Ð 9.60 1.91 3.86

1¡B2¡B3 ¨£ªí7a»¡©ú¡C

¤­¡B¦U¶µ¯S©ÊÀË©w¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¸g¥Á°ê83¡B85¤Î86¦~¤T¦~¥þ¬Ù²Î¤@ÀË©w®EÀË©wµ²ªG¡A§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¬Ò¬°3¯Å¡]ª½¡Ð±×¡^¡FÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°53.2¢H¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°79.6¢H¡F²æ²É²v²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°17.5¢H¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°19.6¢H¡F­@´H©Ê¨â´Á§@¬Ò¬°¤¤§Ü¡CÅã¥Ü¥»«~ºØ¤§§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¬°¤¤µ¥¦Ü±j¡A²æ²É©Ê¾A¤¤¡A­@´H©Ê¤¤µ¥¡A¦ÓÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v©|°¾°ª¡]ªí8¡B9¡^¡C

A-1. ¯S®íí©w©Ê ¢w ¤@´Á§@
Special stability 1 ¢w 1st crop season
A-1. ¯S®íí©w©Ê ¢w ¤@´Á§@<br>Special stability 1 ¢w 1st crop season

A-2. ¯S®íí©w©Ê ¢w ¤G´Á§@
Special stability 2 ¢w 2nd crop season
A-2. ¯S®íí©w©Ê ¢w ¤G´Á§@<br>Special stability 2 ¢w 2nd crop season

B. ¤@¯ëí©w©Ê
General stabiliy
B. ¤@¯ëí©w©Ê<br>General stabiliy

Medium to late matured

1.Taikeng yuh 45101
2.Taikeng yuh 41713w
3.Taikeng yuh 13120
4.Taikeng yuh 18030(Taikeng 17)
5.Taikeng yuh 53231
6.Taikeng yuh 19610
7.Taikeng yuh 35500
8.Taikeng yuh 19812
9.Taikeng yuh 35031
10.Tainung 67 (ck1)
11.Taichung glutinous 70 (ck2)

Eealy matured
12.Taikeng yuh 35917
13.Taikeng yuh 46461
14.Taikeng 1 (ck3)

¹Ï1.±ð½_°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç°Ñ¸Õ«~¨t½_½\²£¶q¤§Ã­©w©Ê¤ÀªR¡C¡]A. ¯S®íí©w©Ê¡AB. ¤@¯ëí©w©Ê¡^
Fig. 1. Yield stability of keng rice in regional yield trials. (A. Special stability¡AB. General stability)

ªí8.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹­Ë¥ñ©Ê¡AÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v¤Î²æ²É©Ê¤§¤ñ¸û¡]¥Á°ê83¡B85¤Î86¦~¤T¦~¥­§¡¡^
Table 8. Comparision of lodging, grain sprouting and shattering of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 (Average of 1994¡B1996 and 1997).
«~ºØ
Variety
­Ë¥ñµ{«×
Degree of lodging
ÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v¡]¯Å¼Æ¡^
¢H of grain sprouting (score)
²æ²É²v¡]¯Å¼Æ¡^
¢H of shattering (score)
¤@ ´Á §@
1st crop
¤G ´Á §@
2nd crop
¤@ ´Á §@
1st crop
¤G ´Á §@
2nd crop
¤@ ´Á §@
1st crop
¤G ´Á §@
2nd crop
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
2.7 3 53.2(5) 79.6(9) 17.5(5) 19.6(5)
¥x¹A67¸¹
Tainung 67
1.3 1.7 51.7(5) 82.4(9) 35.6(7) 26.7(7)

»¡©ú¡G1.­Ë¥ñµ{«×¤Àª½(1)¡Bª½-±×(3)¡B±×(5)¡B±×-­Ë(7)¡B¤Î­Ë(9)µ¥5¯Å
2.ÁJ¤WµoªÞÀË©w¬°¨ú¦¨¼ô½_¥Dµz5ÁJ®ûªw¦b30¢JµoªÞ¥Íªø½c¤¤6¤Ñ«á­pºâµoªÞ²v¡C¯Å¼Æ°Ï¤À¼Ð·Ç¡G¡Õ30¢H ¬°1¯Å¡A30¡ã60¢H¬°5¯Å¡A61¡ã100¢H¬°9¯Å¡C
3.²æ²É²v¤§´ú©w¬°¨ú5¦¨¼ô½_ÁJ¸m©óªø1 m¡A¼e30 cm¡A¤@Ãä°ª8 cm±×ªO¤§2/3³B¡A¥Î­«1.5 kg¡Aªø30 cm¶êµ©ÅK´Îºu°Ê¤T¦¸¨D²æ²É²v¡A¯Å¼Æ°Ï¤À¼Ð·Ç¡G1¢H¥H¤U¬°1¯Å¡A1¡ã5¢H¬°3¯Å¡A6¡ã25¢H¬°5¯Å¡A26¡ã50¢H¬°7¯Å¡A50¡ã100¢H¬°9¯Å¡C

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G­Ë¥ñ©Ê¡G®ç¶é°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡FÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v¡Gªá½¬°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F²æ²É²v¡Gªá½¬°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ

ªí9.¥x±ð17¸¹¤Î¥x¹A67¸¹­@´H©ÊÀË©w¡]¥Á°ê83¡B85¤Î86¦~¤T¦~¥­§¡¡^
Table 9. Cold tolerance of Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 (Average of 1994¡B1996 and 1997).
«~ºØ
Variety
¤@´Á§@1st crop ¤G´Á§@2nd crop
µ¥¯ÅScore ¤ÏÀ³Reaction µ¥¯ÅScroe ¤ÏÀ³Reaction
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
3.7 MR 4.3 MR
¥x¹A67¸¹
Tainung 67
2.3 R 3.0 MR

»¡©ú¡G²Ä¤@´Á§@­@´H©ÊÀË©w«Y¥H¯±­]´ÁÀË©w¡A¤À¯Å¼Ð·Ç¬°¡G

”k1.ªí ¥Ü §Ü¡]R¡^¡G¸­§eºñ¦â¡AµL±²ÁY¤ÎÅܾí¶À¦â²{¶H¡C
”m3.ªí¥Ü¤¤§Ü¡]MR¡^¡G²Ä1¸­¤Î¤ß¸­³¡¥÷§e¾í¶À¦â©Î±²¸­¡C
”o5.ªí¥Ü¤¤·P¡]MS¡^¡G²Ä1¸­¤Î¤ß¸­¥þ³¡ÅܶÀ¡C
”q7.ªí ¥Ü ·P¡]S¡^ ¡G¥þ®è§e¾í¶À¦â¡A¸­±²ÁY¡A´Ó®è¬\µä¡A¦ý²ô©|§eºñ¦â¡C
”s9.ªí¥Ü·¥·P¡]HS¡^¡G¥þ®è¬\¦º¡C

“DzĤG´Á§@­@´H©ÊÀË©w«Y¥H¦¨¼ô´Á¸Z¹ê²v¬°¤À¯Å¨Ì¾Ú¡A¨ä¼Ð·Ç¬°¡G

”k1.ªí ¥Ü §Ü¡]R¡^¡G½_½\µ²¹ê²v¦b80¢H¥H¤W¡C
”m3.ªí¥Ü¤¤§Ü¡]MR¡^¡G½_½\µ²¹ê²v¦b61¡ã80¢H¡C
”o5.ªí¥Ü¤¤·P¡]MS¡^¡G½_½\µ²¹ê²v¦b41¡ã60¢H¡C
”q7.ªí ¥Ü ·P¡]S¡^¡G½_½\µ²¹ê²v¦b11¡ã40¢H¡C
”s9.ªí¥Ü·¥·P¡]HS¡^¡G½_½\µ²¹ê²v¦b10¢H¥H¤U¡C

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G®ç¶é°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ

¤»¡B¯fÂή`©è§Ü©Ê¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹©ó¥Á°ê83¡B85¤Î86¦~¤T¦~¥þ¬Ù²Î¤@¯fÂήEÀË©wµ²ªG¡A¸­½_¼ö¯f¬°¤¤§Ü¦Ü§Ü¡AÁJ½_¼ö¯f¬°¤¤§Ü¡F¯¾¬\¯f¬°·P¦Ü·¥·P¡F¥Õ¸­¬\¯f¤¤·P¦Ü·¥·P¡F¿¥¸­¬\¯f¬°·P¡F¹ï½Å­¸½¾¡B´³­¸½¾¡B¥Õ­I­¸½¾¤§©è§Ü©Ê¬Ò¬°·P¯Å¡A¤G¤Æ¿ÁÂά\¤ß²v¬°64.6¢H¡C¥x±ð17¸¹¹ï¯fÂή`¤§©è§Ü©Ê°£½_¼ö¯fªí²{¸û±j¥~¡A¨ä¥L»P¤@¯ë«~ºØ¬Û¦P¬Òªí²{¤£¨Î¡AÀ³¨Ì¯fÂή`¹w´úĵ³ø¤Î¥Ð¶¡¹ê»Úµo¯f±¡§Î¤Î¦­¾A®É¨¾ªv¡]ªí10¡^¡C

ªí10a.¡@¦UºØ§Ü¯f¡B§ÜÂΩÊÀË©w¡Ð½_¼ö¯f
Table 10a. The evaluation of resistance to major pests ¡VBlast.
«~ºØVariety ¥x±ð17¸¹Taikeng 17 ¥x¹A67¸¹Tainung 67
¦~«× Year 1994 1996 1997 mean 1994 1996 1997 mean
¤ô¥Ð¦¡¯f®E¡]¤@´Á¡^ Paddy nursery (1st crop)
¸­½_¼ö¯f   Leaf blast
¹Å¸q¥«
Chiayi
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
1 2.5 4 2.5 5 6.5 5 5.5
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
R R MR R MR S MR MS
Ãö¤sÂí
Kuanshan
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
3.5 2 4 3.2 8.5 4 8 6.8
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
MR R MR MR HS MR S S
¥­ §¡
Mean
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
2.3 2.3 4 2.8 6.8 5.3 6.5 6.2
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
R R MR R S MS S S
ÁJ½_¼ö¯f  Panicle blast
¹Å¸q¥«
Chiayi
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
1 2 3 2.0 7 9 9 8.3
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
R MR MR MR S HS HS HS
Ãö¤sÂí
Kuanshan
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
2 2 4 2.7 8 4 8 6.7
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
MR MR MS MR HS MS HS S
¥­ §¡
Mean
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
1.5 2 3.5 2.3 7.5 6.5 8.5 7.5
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
MR MR MR MR S S HS S
§ò¥Ð¦¡¯f®E   Upland nursery
¹Å¸q¥«   Chiayi
¤@´Á
1st crop
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
1 4 1 2.0 8 9 9 8.6
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
R MR R R S HS HS HS
¤G´Á
2nd crop
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
1 1 4 2.0 9 8.5 8 8.5
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
R R MR R HS HS S HS

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò¡B¥xªF°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ

ªí10b.¡@¦UºØ§Ü¯f¡B§ÜÂΩÊÀË©w¡Ð¯¾¬\¯f
Table 10b. The evaluation of resistance to major pests - Sheath blight.
«~ºØVariety ¥x±ð17¸¹Taikeng 17 ¥x¹A67¸¹Tainung 67
¦~«×Year 1994 1996 1997 mean 1994 1996 1997 mean
¤@ ´Á §@

1st crop
¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
8.5 8.0 7.8 8.1 7.0 8.2 8.2 7.8
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
HS HS HS HS S HS HS HS
¤G ´Á §@ 2nd crop ¿©¯f¯Å¼Æ
Class
5.3 6.0 6.8 6.0 5.3 6.2 6.1 5.8
¤ÏÀ³
Reaction
S S S S S S S S
ªí10c.¡@¦UºØ§Ü¯f¡B§ÜÂΩÊÀË©w¡Ð¨ä¥L
Table 10c. The evaluation of resistance to major pests ¡VOthers.
«~ºØVariety ¥x±ð7¸¹Taikeng 17 ¥x¹A67¸¹Tainung 67
¦~«×Year 1994 1996 1997 mean 1994 1996 1997 mean
¥Õ¸­¬\¯f1 Bacterial leaf blight
¤@ ´Á §@1st crop
XM-42 ¯f´³­±¿n
spot area
49 36 47 44.0 48 45 49 47.3
¤ÏÀ³Reaction S S S S S S S S
XF-81 ¯f´³­±¿n
spot area
16 28 28 24.0 17 40 35 30.7
¤ÏÀ³Reaction MS S S MS MS S S S
¤G ´Á §@2nd crop
XM-42 ¯f´³­±¿n
spot area
81 39 63 61.0 16 47 67 43.3
¤ÏÀ³Reaction HS S HS HS MS S HS S
XF-81 ¯f´³­±¿n
spot area
20 21 32 24.3 15 31 45 30.3
¤ÏÀ³Reaction MS MS S MS MS S S S
¿¥¸­¬\¯f2
Rice stripe virus
¿©¯f²v
¢H of disease
100 11.1 50.0 53.7 100 30.0 45.4 58.5
¤ÏÀ³Reaction HS R S S HS MR S S
½Å­¸½¾Brown planthopper
¯±­]Seedling ¿©¯f¯Å¼ÆClass 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
¤ÏÀ³Reaction S S S S S S S S
¦¨®èPlant ¿©¯f¯Å¼ÆClass 9 9 9 9 7 9 9 8.3
¤ÏÀ³Reaction S S S S S S S S
´³­¸½¾
Small brown planthopper
¿©¯f¯Å¼ÆClass 7 9 9 8.3 9 9 9 9
¤ÏÀ³Reaction S S S S S S S S
¥Õ­I­¸½¾
White-backed Planthopper
¿©¯f¯Å¼ÆClass 9 7 9 8.3 9 7 9 8.3
¤ÏÀ³Reaction S S S S S S S S
¤G¤Æ¿ÁÂÎ
Rice stem borer
¬\¤ß²v
¢H of wilting stem
89.4 51.4 52.9 64.6 72.4 66.7 45.0 61.4

1.¥Õ¸­¬\¯f¤§XM-42¡BXF81¬°µß®èºØÃþ
2.¿¥¸­¬\¯f¬°«Ç¤ºÀË©w¦¨ÁZ

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¥Õ¸­¬\¯f¡G¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F¿¥¸­¬\¯f¡G°ª¶¯°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F§ÜÂÎÀË©w¡G¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò

¤C¡B¦Ì½è¡B­¹¨ýÀË©w¡G

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤§¦Ì²É¥~Æ[¤Î­¹¨ý«~½è¡A¸g¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ85¡B86¦~¤G¦~¤§ÀË©wµ²ªG¡A¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¥Õ¦Ì¤§³z©ú«×¬Ò¬°3¯Å¡A¤ß¡B¸¡¡B­I¥Õ¬Ò¬°0¯Å¡AÅã¥Ü¨ä¥~Æ[¦Ì½èÀu¨}¡A¦Ó­¹¨ý¤G¦~¥|´Á§@ÀË©wµ²ªG¬Ò»P­¹¨ýÀu¨}¤§¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x±ð9¸¹¦P¯Å¡]B¯Å¡^¡A¤×©ó¦Ì¶º¤§¥~Æ[¤W¡A¥|´Á§@¬ÒÀu©ó¥xúz9¸¹¡C²Ä¤G´Á§@¦¬Ã¬«á¸g¥|­Ó¤ë±`·ÅÀx¦s¡A¨ä­¹¨ý¤´»P¥x±ð9¸¹¦P¯Å¡]ªí11¡ã13¡^¡C

ªí11.¡@°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¥x±ð17¸¹»P¥x¹A67¸¹¤§¦Ì½èÀË©w¡]¥Á°ê85¡B86¦~¨â¦~¥­§¡¡^
Table 11. The evaluation of grain quality between Taikeng 17 and Tainung 67 in regional yield trail (Aveage of 1996 and 1997).
«~ ºØVariety ¥x±ð17¸¹Taikeng 17 ¥x¹A67¸¹Tainung 67
´Á §@Crop season ¢¹ ¢º ¢¹ ¢º
ÁW¦Ì²v¡]¢H¡^
Brown rice
81.94 82.17 82.68 82.58
§¹¾ã¥Õ¦Ì²v¡]¢H¡^
Head rice
62.04 71.24 67.65 69.80
²É ªø1
Grain length
S S S S
§Î ª¬2
Shope
B B B B
³z©ú«×3
Transparency
3 3 3.3 3.3
¤ß ¥Õ4
White center
0 0 0 0.5
¸¡ ¥Õ5
White belly
0 0 2 1.5
­I ¥Õ6
White back
0 0 0 0
½k¤Æ·Å«×7
Gel.temp.
6.0L 6.0L 5.9I/L 6.0L
ª½Ãì©Ê¾ý¯»§t¶q¡]¢H¡^
Amylose content
18.3 20.2 18.6 20.3
²Ê³J¥Õ½è¡]¢H¡^
Crude protein content
8.00 7.07 7.43 6.81
¾®½¦®i©µ©Ê8
Gel. consistency
84S 65S 90S 82S

³Æµù¡G¦Ì½èÀË©w¤§¤À¯Å¼Ð·Ç¬°¡G

  1. ªø«×¡]mm¡^¤À¬°¤»¯Å¡GVL¡G7.500¥H¤W¡BL¡G7.06-7.500¡BML¡G6.61-7.059¡BM¡G6.101-6.609¡BMS¡G5.51-6.100¡BS¡G5.510¥H¤U¡C
  2. §Îª¬¡]ªø¼e¤ñ¡^¤À¬°¤T¯Å¡GS¡G3¥H¤W¡BI¡G2.01-2.99¡BB¡G2¥H¤U¡C
  3. ³z©ú«×¤À¬°¤»¯Å¡G¥Ñ0¦Ü5¡C­I¥Õ¤À¬°¤»¯Å¡G¥Ñ0¦Ü5¡C
  4. ¤ß¥Õ¤À¬°¤»¯Å¡G¥Ñ0¦Ü5¡C½k¤Æ·Å«×¤À¬°¤C¯Å¡G¥Ñ1¦Ü7¡BI¡Ð¤¤µ¥¡BL¡Ð§C¡C
  5. ¸¡¥Õ¤À¬°¤»¯Å¡G¥Ñ0¦Ü5¡C¾®½¦®i©µ©Ê¤À¬°¤T¯Å¡GH¡Ðµw¡BM¡Ð¤¤¶¡¡BS¡Ð³n¡C

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F½_½\¨Ó·½¡G¹ü¤Æ¿¤°ñÀY¶m

ªí12.¡@°Ï°ì¸ÕÅç¥x±ð17¸¹¡B¥x¹A67¸¹¤Î¥x±ð9¸¹¤§­¹¨ý¤ñ¸û
Table 12. Comparison of panel test of cooked rice between Taikeng 17¡BTainung 67 and Taikeng 9 in regional yield trail.
«~ºØ
Variety
´Á§@
Crop
season
¦~«×
Year
¥~Æ[
Appearance
­»
Scent
¤f¨ý
Flavor
ÂH©Ê
Stickiness
µw©Ê
Hardness
Á`µû
Overall seasory evaluation
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
¢¹ 1996 0.429A 0.072B ¡Ð0.143B ¡Ð0.429C 0.456A ¡Ð0.179B
1997 0.814A ¡Ð0.005B 0.146B 0.241B ¡Ð0.146B 0.241B
¢º 1996 0.034B 0 B ¡Ð0.100B ¡Ð0.067B 0 B ¡Ð0.067B
1997 0.212B ¡Ð0.091B ¡Ð0.081B 0.121B ¡Ð0.222B 0.030B
¥x¹A67¸¹
Tainung 67
¢¹ 1996 0.108B 0.058B ¡Ð0.392C ¡Ð0.575C 0.717A ¡Ð0.308C
1997 0.500A 0 B 0.100B 0 B ¡Ð0.282B 0.100B
¢º 1996 0.137B 0 B 0.091B 0.046B 0.137B 0 B
1997 ¡Ð0.046B 0 B ¡Ð0.046B ¡Ð0.241B 0.460A ¡Ð0.460C
¥x±ð9¸¹
Taikeng 9
¢¹ 1996 0.100B ¡Ð0.110B 0.055B ¡Ð0.055B ¡Ð0.256B ¡Ð0.175B
1997 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B
¢º 1996 ¡Ð0.067B ¡Ð0.133B ¡Ð0.133B ¡Ð0.167B 0.133B ¡Ð0.133B
1997 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B

»¡©ú¡G¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¡G85¦~¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¬°¹ü¤Æ¨}½è¦Ì¥Í²£°Ï¤§¥xúz9¸¹¡A86¦~¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¬°¦P¸ÕÅç¥Ð¥Í²£¤§¥xúz9¸¹¡C

¥~Æ[¡B­»¡B¤f¨ý¡BÁ`µû¤§Aªí¥ÜÀu©ó¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¤ñ¹ï·Ó«~ºØ®t¡C

ÂH©Ê¤§Aªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØÂH¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¤£ÂH¡C

µw©Ê¤§Aªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØµw¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ³n¡C

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F¼Ë«~¨Ó·½¡G¹ü¤Æ¿¤°ñÀY¶m

µ²½×»P°Q½×

¡@¡@¤ô½_¥x±ð17¸¹¬°¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¦b°ª«~½è¤§¨|ºØ¥Ø¼Ð¤U¡A¥Ñ¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò²¾°e¤§²Î¤@¨|ºØ§÷®Æ¤¤¿ï¨|¦Ó¦¨¡A¦ÛÂø¥æ¦Ü©R¦W±À¼s¾ú®É¤Q¦~¡C¥Ñ¦U¯Å¸ÕÅç¤ÎÀË©wµ²ªGÅã¥Ü¡A¥»«~ºØ¨ã¦³¦Ì²É¥~Æ[¤Î­¹¨ý¬ÒÀu¨}¡B§Ü½_¼ö¯f¤Î¨ã¬Û·í²£¶qµ¥Àu¨}¯S©Ê¡A¦Ó¨ä¥D­n¤§¯ÊÂI¬°§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤£±j¡A®â°ö¤W»Ý¥[±jÄ鱯¤ô¤Î¬IªÎºÞ²z¡C¯÷±N¥xúz17¸¹¤§Àu¯ÊÂI¤Î®â°ö¤WÀ³ª`·N¨Æ¶µ¦C­z©ó«á¡G

¤@¡B¥x±ð17¸¹¤§Àu¯ÊÂI¡G

(¤@)ÀuÂI

1.¦Ì½èÀu¨}¡B­¹¨ý¨Î

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¨ã¦³¨}¦n¤§¦Ì²É¥~Æ[¡A³z©ú«×¨Î¡A¤ß¡B¸¡¥Õ¬Æ¤Ö¡A¥B­¹¨ýÀu¨}¡A¸g¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õÀË©wµ²ªG¡A¨ä¥Õ¦Ì¤§³z©ú«×¬°3¯Å¡A¤ß¡B¸¡¡B­I¥Õ¬Ò¬°0¯Å¡A¥B¦~´Á¶¡¤§ªí²{¬Ò¬Û·íí©w¡CÁW¦Ì²v²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°81.94%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°82.17%¡F§¹¾ã¥Õ¦Ì²v²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°62.04%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°71.24%¡C¦Ó¨ä­¹¨ý¤§ªí²{¡A85¡B86¦~¨â¦~¥|´Á§@»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥xúz9¸¹¤ñ¸ûµ²ªG¬Ò¬Û¦P¡]B¯Å¡^¡A¦Ì¶º¼ä¥Õ«GÄR¡AÂH«×¾A¤¤¨Ã´I¦³¼u©Ê¡C

ªí13.¡@¥x±ð17¸¹»P¥x±ð9¸¹½_½\ÀxÂä§­¹¨ý¤ñ¸û
Table 13. Comparison of panel test of cooked rice between Taikeng 17 and Taikeng 9 in storing rough rice.
Àx¦s¤è¦¡
Store mode
Àx¦s´Á¶¡
Store duration
«~ºØ
Variety
¥~Æ[
Appearance
­»
Scent
¤f¨ý
Flavor
ÂH©Ê
Stickiness
µw©Ê
Hardness
Á`µû
Overall seasory evaluation
±`·Å
Room
¤@­Ó¤ë
One month
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
0.182B 0 B ¡Ð0.091B ¡Ð0.091B 0.182B ¡Ð0.091B
¥x±ð9¸¹
Taikeng 9
0.182B 0 B 0 B ¡Ð0.182B 0.091B 0 B
¤G­Ó¤ë
Two months
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B ¡Ð0.125B ¡Ð0.125B
¥x±ð9¸¹
Taikeng 9
0.125B 0 B 0 B ¡Ð0.125B 0 B ¡Ð0.125B
¤T­Ó¤ë
Three months
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
0 B 0 B ¡Ð0.111B ¡Ð0.222B 0.111B ¡Ð0.222B
¥x±ð9¸¹
Taikeng 9
0.111B 0 B 0 B ¡Ð0.111B 0 B ¡Ð0.111B
¥|­Ó¤ë
Four months
¥x±ð17¸¹
Taikeng 17
0 B ¡Ð0.2 B ¡Ð0.1 B ¡Ð0.2 B 0.1 B ¡Ð0.2 B
¥x±ð9¸¹
Taikeng 9
0.2 B ¡Ð0.1 B ¡Ð0.1 B ¡Ð0.1 B 0.1 B ¡Ð0.1 B

»¡©ú¡G½_½\¦¬Ã¬¤é´Á¡G86¦~12¤ë5¤é

¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¡G¹ü¤Æ¨}½è¦Ì¥Í²£°Ï¤§¥x±ð9¸¹¡AÀx¦s¤è¦¡¬°§NÂáC

¥~Æ[¡B­»¡B¤f¨ý¡BÁ`µû¤§Aªí¥ÜÀu©ó¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¤ñ¹ï·Ó«~ºØ®t¡C

ÂH©Ê¤§Aªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØÂH¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¤£ÂH¡C

µw©Ê¤§Aªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØµw¡ABªí¥Ü»P¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¦P¡ACªí¥Ü¸û¹ï·Ó«~ºØ³n¡C

¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡G¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡F½_½\¨Ó·½¤ÎÀx¦s¡G¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¹Å¸q¤À³õ¡]³À¯ó¡^

2.¤¤§Ü½_¼ö¯f

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¸g¥Á°ê83¡B85¤Î86¦~µ¥¤T¦~©ó¹Å¸q¡BÃö¤s¨â³B²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©wµ²ªG¡A¹ï¸­½_¼ö¯f¤§©è§Ü©Ê¬°¤¤§Ü¦Ü§Ü¯Å¡AÁJ½_¼ö¯f¬°¤¤§Ü¯Å¡A¥B¦~´Á»P¦a°Ï¶¡¤§ªí²{¬Ò©|ºÙí©w¡C°ß¦³Å²©ó½_¼ö¯fµo¥Í¤§½ÆÂø©Ê¡A¥Ð¶¡®â°öÀ³ÀH®Éª`·Nµo¯f±¡§Î¡A­Ú¯à¤Î®É¨¾ªv¡A´î¤Ö·l¥¢¡C

3.´áªÎ¤ÏÀ³¨Î

¡@¡@¥»«~ºØ¹ï´áªÎ¤§¤ÏÀ³¡A¸g¥»³õ85¡B86¦~¨â¦~´ú©w¤§µ²ªG¡AµL½×²Ä¤@´Á§@©Î²Ä¤G´Á§@¨ä½_½\²£¶q¬ÒÀH´áªÎ¤§¼W¬I¦ÓÅãµÛ¤É°ª¡A¦Ü³Ì°ª¯Å¶Z200kg-N/ha¹F³Ì°ª²£¡C¨ä®è°ªÁöÀH´áªÎ¤§¼W¬I¦Ó³vº¥¼W°ª¡A¦ý¨ä­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤@ª½«O«ù¨}¦n¡Aª½¦Ü200kg-N/ha®É¤~¦³¶É±×²{¶Hµo¥Í¡C°ß¨C¤½³¼¬I¥Î160 kg´á¯À¡A¨ä½_½\²£¶q¤w¥i¹F¬Û·í¤ô·Ç¡]¤@´Á§@¨C¤½³¼8¾·¡A¤G´Á§@6¾·¡^¡A¬°ÅU¤Î®â°ö¦w¥þ¤Î­¹¨ý«~½èÀ³¬°¥»«~ºØ¥i±À¯ò¤§¬IªÎ¶q¡C

4.²æ²É©Ê¾A¤¤

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤§²æ²É©Ê¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¥­§¡¬°17.5%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°19.6%¡A¬Ò¬°¤¤µ¥¡A¤ñ¥x¹A67¸¹²Ä¤@´Á§@´î¤Ö18.1%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@´î¤Ö7.1%¤§²æ²É¡A¥i´î¤Ö¦¬Ã¬¸¨²É¤§·l¥¢¡C

5.¨ã¬Û·í²£¶q

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¤§½_½\²£¶q¡A©ó¥»³õÆ[¹î¸ÕÅç¤Îªì¡B°ª¯Å²£¶q¤ñ¸û¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹¤§99.5%¦Ü111.6%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°93.5%¦Ü100%¡A¨äÂײ£©Ê²¤¦P©ó¥x¹A67¸¹¡A¥B©|ºÙ¥­Ã­¡C©ó¥þ¬Ù°Ï°ì¸ÕÅ礻­Ó¦a°Ï¨â¦~¥|´Á§@¸ÕÅçµ²ªG¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¥­§¡¬°¹ï·Ó«~ºØ¥x¹A67¸¹¤§92.3%¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°97.7%¡Aªí²{¸û¨Î¦a°Ï¬°¹ü¤Æ¡A¨ä²Ä¤@´Á§@²£¶q¬°8,980kg/ha¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°7,947 kg/ha¡A¸û¥x¹A67¸¹¤À§O¼W²£0.1%»P10.7%¡C

(¤G)¯ÊÂI©Îªí²{¸û®z¤§¯S©Ê¡G

1.§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤£±j¡G

¡@¡@¥»«~ºØ®è°ª¤¤µ¥¡A¨ä§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¸gÀË©wµ²ªG¬°ª½¦Ü±×¡A§Y¬°¤¤µ¥¦Ü±j¡A¤@¯ë®â°ö¨ÃµL­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤§ÅU¼{¡A°ß¬I¥Î­«ªÎ©Î®â´Ó©ó±Æ¤ô¤£¨}¦a°Ï¡A¦pµL¨}¦n¤§¥Ð¶¡ºÞ²z¤´©ö¾D­P­Ë¥ñ¡C

2.ÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v©|°¾°ª¡G

¡@¡@¸g¤T¦~¤§ÀË©wµ²ªG¡A¥»«~ºØ¤§ÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v¡A²Ä¤@´Á§@¥­§¡¬°53.2%¡AÄݤ¤«×µoªÞ©Ê¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°79.6%¡AÄÝ©öÁJ¤WµoªÞ©Ê¡A¨â´Á§@¬Ò»P¥x¹A67¸¹Ãþ¦ü¡C¥Ð¶¡®â°öÁJ¤WµoªÞ¥D­nµo¥Í¦b²Ä¤@´Á§@¡A¥»«~ºØÄݤ¤«×µoªÞ©Ê©|¬°°¾°ª¡A»Ý¾A´Á¾¨¦­¦¬Ã¬¡A©Î°µ´¡¯±´Á½Õ¾ã¡A¥H§K¨ü±ö«B¤§®`¾É­PÁJ¤WµoªÞ¡C

3.­@´H©Ê¤¤µ¥¡G

¡@¡@¥»«~ºØ²Ä¤@¡B¤G´Á§@­@´H©Ê¸g¤T¦~¤§ÀË©wµ²ªG¬ÒÄݤ¤§Ü¯Å¡C²Ä¤G´Á§@¤£©y±ß´Ó¡A¥H§K¨üªF¥_©u­·¼vÅT¸Z¹ê¦Ó­P´î²£¤Î­°§C¦Ì½è¡C

4.¹ï¯fÂή`©è§Ü©Ê¤´¤í²z·Q¡G

¡@¡@¥»«~ºØ¹ï¥»¬Ù¤§¥D­n¯fÂή`©è§Ü©Ê¡A°£½_¼ö¯f¤§ªí²{¬°¤¤§Ü¦Ü§Ü¯Å¥~¡A¨ä¾l¦U¶µ¯fÂή`¦p¯¾¬\¯f¡B¥Õ¸­¬\¯f¡B¿¥¸­¬\¯f¡B½Å­¸½¾µ¥§¡»P¥Ø«e¤@¯ë¤§®â°ö«~ºØ¬Û¦ü¡A¯Ê¥F©è§Ü©Ê¡C

(¤T)®â°ö­nÂI¤Îª`·N¨Æ¶µ

1.¥»«~ºØ¾A¦X©ó¥þ¬Ù¦U¦a°Ï¤§³æ´Á§@¥Ð¤ÎÂù´Á§@¥Ð®â°ö¡C

2.¥»«~ºØ¤§¥Í¨|¤é¼Æ»P¥x¹A67¸¹¬Ûªñ¡A®â°öºÞ²z¤è¦¡¥i¨Ì·Ó¥x¹A67¸¹¥Ð¶¡§@·~¹ê¬I¡C

3.¥»«~ºØ§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¤£±j¡AªÎ®Æ¬I¥Î¶qÀ³¸û¥x¹A67¸¹²¤´î¡A¨C¤½³¼¾A·í¤§¬IªÎ¶q¤@¡B¤G´Á§@¬Ò¬°²¸»Äëâ¡G¹LÁC»Ä¶t¡G´â¤Æ¹[¡×800¡G400¡G140¤½¤ç¡A¨Ì¤@¯ë¤À¬Iªk¹ê¬I¡C

4.¥Ð¶¡¤ô¤ÀºÞ²zÀ³¼F¦æ¥Í¨|¤¤´Á¤§®Í¥Ð±¹¬I¡A¥H¼W¥[§Ü­Ë¥ñ©Ê¡F¦¬Ã¬«e¤Å´£¦­±Æ¤ô¡A¥H§K¼vÅT¦Ì½è¡A¾A·í¤§Â_¤ô®É¶¡¬°¦¬Ã¬«e¤C¤Ñ¥ª¥k¡C

5.¥»«~ºØ¹ï¯¾¬\¯f¡B¥Õ¸­¬\¯f¡B¿¥¸­¬\¯f¡B½Å­¸½¾µ¥¤§©è§Ü©Ê¤í²z·Q¡AÀ³¨Ì¯fÂή`¹w´úĵ³ø¤Î¥Ð¶¡¹ê»Úµo¥Í±¡§Î¤Î¦­¨¾ªv¡A¨ä¥L¯fÂή`¥ç¦P¡C

6.¥»«~ºØ²Ä¤@´Á§@¤§ÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v©|Äݰ¾°ª¡AÀ³¾A´Á¾¨¦­¦¬Ã¬¡A¥H§K¨ü±ö«B¼vÅT¾É­PÁJ¤WµoªÞ¡A¼vÅT«~½è»P²£¶q¡C©Î°µ´¡¯±´Á½Õ¾ã¡A©ó12¤ë¤U¦¯¦Ü1¤ë¤¤¦¯©Î2¤ë¤U¦¯¦Ü3¤ë¤W¦¯´¡¯±¡A¥H´Á±ö«B´Á¨ÓÁ{«e¦¬Ã¬¡A©Î¦¨¼ô«á´ÁÁ×¶}±ö«B´Á¡A¦­´Ó¸û¦³´H®`¤§¼{¡A¥H«á­z¤§´¡¯±´Á¸û©y¡C

7.¥»«~ºØ²Ä¤G´Á§@¥Í¨|«á´Á¤§­@´H©Ê¬°¤¤µ¥¡AÀ³Á×§K±ß´Ó¡A¥H§K¨üªF¥_©u­·¼vÅT¨ä¸Z¹ê²v¡C

8.¨ä¥L®â°öºÞ²z¥i¨Ì·Ó¤@¯ëúz½_®â°öªk¹ê¬I¡C

ªþ¡@¡@¿ý

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¦Ì¶º²i½Õªk¡]¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ±À¼s¤¤¤ß¹A§ø¥Í¬¡¬ã¨s«Ç±À¯ò¡^¡C

  1. ¬~¦Ì¡G§Ö³t¨R¤ô¦Ü¤ô²Mº«§Y¥i¡A¤£©y¥Î¤O·b¬~¡C¦b²^¦Ì®É¡A®û¤ô¤]¦P®É¶i¦æ¡A¦Ì²É¦b³Ìªì¤J¤ôªº¤­¤ÀÄÁ¤º¡A¨ä§l¤ô¶q§Y¹F10¢H¡A¦]¦¹¬~¦Ìªº°Ê§@­n§Ö¡A¥H§K¦Ì²É§l¤JÂø½è©Mż¤ô¡A¼vÅTµN¥X¨Óªº¦Ì¶º­»¨ý¡C
  2. ¤ô¥÷¡G¥H¡u¥x±ð17¸¹¡v¥Õ¦ÌµN¶º®É¡A¦Ì»P¤ôªº®e¿n¤ñ¬°1¡G1.2¡A­Y½Õ»sª£¶º¡A«h¦Ì»P¤ôªº®e¿n¤ñ¬°1¡G1.1¡C
  3. ®û¤ô¡G±N¬~²b«áªº¥Õ¦Ì¨Ì¤W­z¤ñ¨Ò®û©ó°®²bªº¤ô¤¤¤@¤p®É¡A¨Ï¦Ì²É§l¨¬¤ô¥÷¡AµN®É¤~¯à§¹¥þ½k¤Æ¡A«O«ù¶º²É¤§¶´©Ê¡C
  4. ¿T¶º¡G¥H¹qÁçµN¶º¦Ü¶}Ãö¸õ°_¡A¿T¦Ü¤Q¦Ü¤G¤Q¤ÀÄÁ¡A¦A«ö¤U¶}Ãö¤@¦¸¡AÅý¼ö«×¿T°®¹qÁ礤¦h¾lªº¤ô»]®ð¡A¨Ï¶º²É§ó¨ã¼u©Ê¡C­Y¦bµN¶ºªº¤ô¤¤²K¥[´Xºw¨F©Ôªo¦PµN¡AµN¥X¤§¶º²É§ó¨ã¥ú¿A¡A¥B¤£©öªgÂH¡A­Y¥[¤Ö³\¾L©ÎÂfÂc¥Ä¡A¥i¨Ï¦Ì¶º¼ä¥Õ¡A¤£©öµoÃI¡A¥H¦¹½Õ»sª£¶º¡AÁÙ¥i´î§Cª£¶ºªºªo¿°·P¡C

¨Ì¤W­z¨BÆJ²iµN¡u¥x±ð17¸¹¡v¦Ì¶º¡A²É²É´¹¼ü«GÄR¡A­»¢ß¥i¤f¡C

»x¡@¡@ÁÂ

¡@¡@¥x±ð17¸¹¨|¦¨¹Lµ{¦U¶µ¯S©ÊÀË©w¤À§O¥Ñ®ç¶é¡B¥x¤¤¡B¥x«n¡B°ª¶¯¡B¥xªF¡Bªá½¬°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¤Î¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Òµ¥7³õ©Ò¶i¦æ¡AÂÔ¦V°Ñ»P¦U¶µÀË©w¤u§@¦P¤¯»xªíÁ§աC

¤Þ¥Î¤åÄm

  1. ¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1996¡B1997¡C½_¦Ì«~½èÀË©w³ø§i¡C
  2. ¥x¤¤°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_§Ü¥Õ¸­¬\¯f²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©w¸ÕÅç³ø§i¡C
  3. ¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1998¡C¤ô½_·s«~¨t¥xúz¨|18030¸¹¥Ó½Ðµn°O©R¦W¼f¬d¸ê®Æ¡C
  4. ¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_§Ü¯¾¬\¯f²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©w¸ÕÅç³ø§i¡C
  5. ¨L§e¦]¡C1974¡C½_§@¾Ç»P¦Ì¡C®}¤ó°òª÷·|¡Cp.163¡ã262¡C
  6. ªá½¬°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_·s«~¨tÁJ¤WµoªÞ²v¤Î²æ²É©Ê¤§ÀË©w³ø§i¡C
  7. °ª¶¯°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_§Ü¿¥¸­¬\¯f²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©w¸ÕÅç³ø§i¡C
  8. ®ç¶é°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_­@­Ë¥ñ©Ê´úÅç³ø§i¡C
  9. ®ç¶é°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_­@´H©ÊÀË©w³ø§i¡C
  10. ±i¾|´¼¡C1964¡C¸ÕÅç§Þ³N¡C°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¹A¾Ç°|¡Cp.41¡ã64¡A245¡ã251¡C
  11. ´ö¤å³q¡C1967¡C§@ª«¨|ºØ¤§­ì²z»P¹ê¬I¡C°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¹A¾Ç°|¡Cp.61¡ã96¡C
  12. ¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò¡B¥xªF°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_§Ü½_¼ö¯f²Î¤@¯f®EÀË©w¸ÕÅç³ø§i¡C
  13. ¹Å¸q¹A·~¸ÕÅç¤À©Ò¡C1994¡B1996¡B1997¡C¤ô½_§Ü½Å­¸½¾ÀË©w³ø§i¡C
  14. ¿c¦u¯Ñ¡C1974¡C²{¥N§@ª«¨|ºØ¾Ç¡C°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Ç¹A¾Ç°|¡Cp.169¡ã193¡C

Development of a New Japonica Rice Variety ¡§Taikeng 17¡¨

Lin, G. C., F. F. Hou and L. T. Chen

Summary

¡@¡@A newly bred japonica rice variety ¡§Taikeng 17¡¨ was released by Chiayi Branch Station of the Tainan District Agricultural Improvement Station in Nov. 1998. Its female parent is the F2 plant (the second generation) of ¡§Tainung70/Milyang 79//Tainung70¡¨, the male parent is Tainung 70, and the cross was made in 1989 by Chiayi Agricultural Experiment Station. The breeding line was originally named ¡§Taikeng yuh 18030¡¨ in 1991 when it was firstly selected out from the F4, and therfore was sent to Chiayi Branch Station Tainan DAIS for further experiment in 1992. The observational, preliminary, advanced and the regional yield trials, as well as other screen testing of this line were conducted from 1992 to 1997. After evaluation by the Committee of Registration for New Rice Varieties of the Provincial Department of Agriculture and Forestry, ¡§Taikeng Yuh 18030¡¨ was finally named ¡§Taikeng 17¡¨. This medium to late maturing variety is characterized with the merits of excellent grains qualities both in its appearance and eating, resistant to rice blast, well response to nitrogen, suitable shattering rate, and being able to product a high yield.

¡@¡@Key words: Japonica rice, Taikeng 17

¡@¡@Accepted for publication: October 27, 1999


¡@

¦^¬ã¨s·J³ø¥Ø¿ý