| ¦æ¬F°|¹A·~©eû·|¥x«n°Ï¹A·~§ï¨}³õ ¬ã¨s·J³ø²Ä15¸¹ |
¤ô½_¯¾¬\¯fìµß¤§¥ÍºA¤Î¥Íª«¨¾ªv¬ã¨s
§ùª÷¦À¡@±i¸q¼ý
ºK¡@¡@n
¤ô½_¯¾¬\¯f¡]Rhizoctonia solani Küuhn AG1¡^¥Hµß®Ö¬°¥Dn·P¬V·½¡Cµß®Ö¤j³¡¥÷º}¯B©ó½_¥Ð¤ô±¡A¥H¾ã¥Ð¦Ü´¡¯±´Á¶¡µß®Ö¶q³Ì¦h¡A¨CÓ112.5cm2µß®Ö®·¶°ºô10¤é¤ºµß®Ö¦¬¶°¶q¦b«ÌªFÅﬥ¸ÕÅç¥Ð²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°18.7Ó¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°52.7Ó¡A¦b¥x¤¤¤j¦w¸ÕÅç¥Ð²Ä¤@´Á§@¬°49.4Ó¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@¬°31Ó¡A´¡¯±«á¥Ð¶¡µß®Ö®·¶°¼Æ³v¤é»¼´î¡A¤@Ó¤ë«á´N¤£©ö®·®»¨ìµß®Ö¡C¦U´Á§@½_¥Ð¯¾¬\¯fìµß¨C¤½³¼µß®Ö®·¶°Á`¼Æ¶q¬°«ÌªFÅﬥ¸ÕÅç¥Ð²Ä¤@´Á§@4.7¡Ñ107Ó¡Aµo¯f²v14.1¢H¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@1.02¡Ñ108Ó¡Aµo¯f²v23.2¢H¡A¥x¤¤¤j¦w¸ÕÅç¥Ð²Ä¤@´Á§@8.3¡Ñ107Ó¡Aµo¯f²v45.2¢H¡A²Ä¤G´Á§@4.6¡Ñ107¡Aµo¯f²v53.4¢H¡C²Ä¤@´Á§@ªì´Á¦è¥_©u·¸û±j¡A½_¥ÐªF«n¨¤¤ô±º}¯B¤§µß®Ö³Ì¦h¡A¨Ã§e·¥ÅãµÛ¤§®t²§¡C¦]¦¹¡Aµß®Ö¦b½_¥Ð¤ô±¤§¤À§G¡A·¦V¤Î·³t¼vÅT»á¤j¡AÄéµ@¤ô¦¸¤§¡C
½_ÝϬ°¯fìµßµß®Ö¥Dn´þ¥Í³B©Ò¡A¨ä²£¥Í¨ü¨ìªÅ®ð¬Û¹ï·Ã«×¤Î·Å«×¤§¼vÅT»á¤j¡CRH88¢H¤§Àã«×¤U¡A20¡ã(24)¡ã28¢J³Ì©ö²£¥Íµß®Ö¡A24¢J®É¥§¡¨C¤@¿©¯f½_±ì¥i²£¥Í11ӵ߮֡C¦bPDA°ö¾i°ò¤W¡A12¡ã(16)¡ã24¢J§¡©ö²£¥Íµß®Ö¡C32¢J®É¯f®è¤W¥i²£¥Íµß®Ö¡A¦ý¦bPDA¤W«h²£¥Í¤j¶q®ð¥Íµßµ·¡C¥x¤¤¤j¦w¸ÕÅç¥Ð¦b²Ä¤@´Á§@¡]®â´Ó¥x«n5¸¹¡^¦¬Ã¬®É½Õ¬d¤ô½_¯¾¬\¯f®è¤Wµß®Ö»P±¼¸¨¤gªí±¤§¤ñ¨Ò¬ù¬°8¡G1¡A¦¬Ã¬«á¿©¯f½_ÝϤ¤¥§¡©|µo²{¦³28.6ӵ߮֡A«ÌªFÅﬥ«h¥§¡¬°¨C½_ÝÏ9.7ӵ߮֡C«ÌªF¸ÕÅç¥Ð©ó²Ä¤G´Á¤ô½_¦¬Ã¬«á¬ù1¤ëµo²{¥§¡¨C¤@½_ÝϦ³46.8ӵ߮֡A½_ÝÏ¥~¤gÄ[µß®Ö«h¬Æ¬°µ}¤Ö¡C
µß®Ö¦b¿n¤ôª¬ªp¤U¡A®I¤J¤g¤¤2cm¥H¤U¡A¨ä´Ý¦s¤O¬ù8Ó¤ë¡A¤gªí±µß®Ö¥i¦s¬¡2¦~¥H¤W¡C
¤ô½_¯¾¬\¯fìµß±H¥D½d³ò¬Æ¼s¡A¦p°¨¹aÁ¦¡B¤j¨§¡B½Ü¨§¡B¥É¦Ì¡B°ª¸d»P¨È³Âµ¥¥V©uùا@¤Î¥Ð¶¡Âø¯ó§¡¥i³Q¦M®`¡A¯f®è¤]·|²£¥Íµß®Ö¡A¤×¥HÞû¯ó¡]Echinochlora crus-galli¡^¬°¬Æ¡C
®ð·Å28¢J®É³Ì¾A¯¾¬\¯f¤§µo¥Í¡A24¢J®É³Ì¾A©y¯f´³ÂX®i¡A12¢J®É±µºØ7¤Ñ¨Ã¥¼¨£µo¯f¡C¬Û¹ï·Å«×¡]RH¡^81¡ã92¢H³Ì¾A©y¯¾¬\¯fµo¯f¡ARH95¢H¥H¤W¹ï¯¾¬\¯fµy¦³¨î¡A§C©óRH65¢H®É«h¤£§Q¯¾¬\¯fµo¥Í¡C
¤ô½_«~ºØ¹ï¯¾¬\¯f§¡¬°·P¯f¡C¦b¦ÛµMÀô¹Ò¤U¡A¥H¤H¤u±µºØ5ӨѸի~ºØ¡AÁö¿©¯f²vµL®t²§¡A¦ý¯f´³¤§ÂX®i«h¦]«~ºØ¦Ó¦³µ{«×¤W¤§®t²§¡C
Trichoderma harzianum ¹ïRhizoctonia solani ¨ã¦³±j±H¥Í¤O¡A¦ý§Ü¥Í¤ÎÄv¥Í¯à¤O¸û®t¡CTrichoderma viride ¤ÎTrichoderma konigii¦³±jªº§Ü¥Í¤O¡A¦ý±H¥Í¤O¸û®t¡C
Ecology of Rice Sheath Blight Pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn AG1, with References on the Biological Control with Trichoderma spp.
C. C. Tu and Y. C. Chang
Summary
The majority of sclerotia of Rhizoctonia solani AG 1 floated on the irrigation water to serve as the primary inoculum of the rice sheath blight. The highest population was found during the period from land preparation to transplanting of seedlings. There were approximately 18.7 and 52.7 sclerotia collected from each 112 cm2 area of water surface in the 1st and 2nd crop or rice, respectively, in Pin-tung trial during this period, while approximately 49.4 and 31 sclerotia in the 1st and 2nd crop of rice, respectively, in Tai-chung trial. Eventually the number of floating sclerotia decreased and almost disappeared one month later. The total sclerotia floating on the irrigation water was estimated 4.7 ¡Ñ 107 sclerotia/ha at the 1st crop of rice with 14.1% of the disease, or 1.02 ¡Ñ 108 sclerotia/ha at the 2nd crop of rice with 23.2% of the disease in the Pin-tung trial, while 8.3 ¡Ñ 107 sclerotia/ha at the 1st crop of rice with 45.2% of the disease, or 4.6 ¡Ñ 107 sclerotia/ha at the 2nd crop of rice with 53.4% of the disease in the Tai-chung trial.
Since the northwest monsoon is usually stronger in the early stage of the 1st crop of rice, more sclerotia were collected from the southeast corner of the paddy fields observed. It was thus concluded that the distribution of sclerotia of R. solani AG 1 on the water surface on the paddy fields was greatly influenced by the direction and velocity of wind. The running direction of irrigation water played as the role of second importance.
The optimum condition for sclerotial formation on diseased stalk was found at 20-(24)-28¢J with a relative humidity (RH) of 88%; approximately 11 sclerotia/stalk was observed at 24¢J. The fungus produced more sclerotia at 12-(16)-24¢J on potato-dextrose agar medium. Few sclerotia formed on the diseased plants at 32¢J, but none was observed on potato-dextrose agar medium.
The sclerotia formed on the diseased plants were, however, partly dropped onto the soil in the field after harvest. The ratio between those remaining on the stubble and dropping onto the soil was found to be 8:1 in Ta-an, Tai-chung. It was found that about 28.6 sclerotia on each stabble after the harvest of the 1st crop of rice and about 16.8 sclerotia per stabble after the harvest of the 2nd crop of rice.
The longevity of sclerotia was about 8 months in soil under the submerged condition. However, they survived longer than 2 years if they were placed on the soil surface instead of in the soil.
The pathogen was proved with a very wide host range. Winter crops of paddy field such as potato, soybean, pea, corn, sorghum, flax and numerous paddy weeds were included. Sclerotial formation was also found from some diseased plants, especially those of Echinochlora crus-galli.
The disease was the most prevalent at 28¢J. The spot expanded rapidly at 24¢J. No disease was observed at 12¢J in 7 days after inoculation. Relative humidity 81~92% was the best condition for the disease development. Higher than RH 95% or lower than RH 65% was not suitable.
All rice varieties tested were susceptible to the disease. There was no difference on the disease incidence among 5 varieties tested, but lesion expansion was different with variety concerned.
Trichoderma harzianum was antagonistic to R. solani AG 1 with the mechanism of parasitism rather than antibiosis and competition. T. viride and T. konigii, the other hand, showed stronger antibiotic effect than parasitic effect to the pathogen. Application of T. viride to control both winter crop (flax) damping off caused by R. solani AG 1 and rice sheath blight was effective but was not statistically significant (p=5%). More studies on the application technique are needed before the practical value of Trichoderma spp. As a bio-control agent to R. solani AG 1 can be determined.